Securing your API is crucial for protecting user data and enabling safe integrations. sillo provides comprehensive OpenAPI documentation for multiple authentication schemes, making it easy for API consumers to understand and implement proper authentication.
Documenting Authentication
Section titled “Documenting Authentication”Securing your API is crucial for protecting user data and enabling safe integrations. sillo provides comprehensive OpenAPI documentation for multiple authentication schemes, making it easy for API consumers to understand and implement proper authentication.
Declare it once
Section titled “Declare it once”An authentication backend already knows which credential it reads.
JWTAuthBackend reads Authorization: Bearer <token>, which is
HTTPBearer(scheme="bearer", bearerFormat="JWT"). So pass your backends to
SilloApp(auth=...) and the document follows from them:
from sillo import SilloAppfrom sillo.auth import JWTAuthBackend, APIKeyAuthBackend, SessionAuthBackend, useAuth
app = SilloApp( auth=[ JWTAuthBackend(secret_key=SECRET, description="A JWT from `POST /login`."), APIKeyAuthBackend(header_name="X-API-Key"), SessionAuthBackend(), ],)That one argument does two jobs: it mounts AuthenticationMiddleware with
those backends, and it publishes each one under
components.securitySchemes as bearerAuth, apiKeyHeader and
sessionCookie.
A route then names a scheme once, on its gate, and its documented
security is derived:
@app.get("/me", auth=useAuth(schemes=["bearerAuth", "sessionCookie"]))async def me(request, response): ..."security": [{"bearerAuth": []}, {"sessionCookie": []}]| Gate | Generated security | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
schemes=["a"] | [{"a": []}] | requires a |
schemes=["a", "b"] | [{"a": []}, {"b": []}] | either one |
schemes=["a", "b"], all_of=True | [{"a": [], "b": []}] | both |
schemes=["a"], required=False | [{"a": []}, {}] | optional |
schemes={"oauth2": ["read:widgets"]} | [{"oauth2": ["read:widgets"]}] | with OAuth2 scopes |
useAuth(): no schemes | every registered scheme, as alternatives | any credential |
| no gate at all | absent | public |
The {} in that fourth row is how OpenAPI spells “authentication is optional”,
an empty requirement object alongside the real ones. Almost nobody writes it by
hand, which is why optional-auth routes are so often documented as mandatory.
The second-to-last row is the one that catches people out. A bare useAuth()
names no scheme but still rejects anonymous callers, and any registered backend
satisfies it, so the document lists them all as alternatives rather than
leaving the route looking public. The same applies to
useAuth(permissions=[...]): needing a permission implies needing an identity.
Why this matters more than the shorter syntax
Section titled “Why this matters more than the shorter syntax”Before this, a route said its auth twice (once as a gate that enforced it, once
as a security= list that documented it) and nothing checked the two against
each other. A document could advertise bearer auth while the gate accepted an
API key, forever, with no test failing.
Turn that into an error:
app = SilloApp(auth=[JWTAuthBackend(secret_key=SECRET)], strict_security=True)Building the document now fails if a route requires a scheme nothing registered:
ValueError: These routes require security schemes that are not registered: /me requires 'sessionCookie'Registered schemes: bearerAuth.Without it, that route renders an authorize box in every viewer wired to a scheme no backend implements, and the first sign of trouble is a 401 the document says is impossible.
strict_security is off by default so existing applications keep building.
scopes= is gone: schemes= is the only spelling
Section titled “scopes= is gone: schemes= is the only spelling”There used to be two identifiers for one fact: a backend reported a method
label on AuthResult.scope ("jwt"), while the document named a scheme
("bearerAuth"), and a route had to know both. They are now one. A backend
reports its own scheme name, and request.scope["auth"] and ["auth_scheme"]
carry the same value.
The old scopes= parameter, which matched the method label, has been removed.
Passing it raises TypeError. Gates name schemes:
| Old | New |
|---|---|
scopes=["jwt"] | schemes=["bearerAuth"] |
scopes=["session"] | schemes=["sessionCookie"] |
scopes=["apikey"] | schemes=["apiKeyHeader"] |
The old spellings on the left are still accepted as schemes values, so a
gate written as schemes=["jwt"] keeps matching a backend that reports
either label.
Naming two backends of the same kind
Section titled “Naming two backends of the same kind”Two JWT secrets (a user token and an admin token) are two schemes:
auth=[ JWTAuthBackend(secret_key=USER_SECRET), JWTAuthBackend(secret_key=ADMIN_SECRET, name="adminBearer", description="Issued only to staff accounts."),]Leave the second unnamed and sillo raises rather than letting one silently overwrite the other, which would document a credential the losing backend never reads.
Opting out
Section titled “Opting out”A backend whose describe() returns None still authenticates; it is just
left out of the document. That is the default for a custom
AuthenticationBackend, so subclasses keep working unchanged:
class InternalBackend(AuthenticationBackend): name = "internal"
def describe(self): return None # enforced, undocumented
async def authenticate(self, request): ...An explicit security= on a route always wins over the derived value. You
need that when a gateway terminates auth ahead of the application and the
document has to describe something this process does not enforce.
When you still register schemes by hand
Section titled “When you still register schemes by hand”config.add_security_scheme remains the way to document a scheme sillo has no
backend for: openIdConnect, an OAuth2 flow handled by an identity provider,
or mutual TLS terminated at a load balancer. The rest of this page covers that
path.
Why Document Authentication?
Section titled “Why Document Authentication?”Proper authentication documentation provides several benefits:
- Security Clarity: API consumers understand exactly how to authenticate
- Integration Speed: Clear auth docs reduce integration time and support requests
- Testing Support: Interactive docs allow testing with real authentication
- Compliance: Proper documentation helps meet security audit requirements
- Developer Experience: Clear auth flows improve API adoption
Bearer Token Authentication
Section titled “Bearer Token Authentication”Bearer token authentication (typically JWT) is the most common modern authentication method. sillo includes built-in support with automatic documentation:
from sillo import SilloApp
app = SilloApp()
# Basic bearer authentication@app.get( "/profile", security=[{"bearerAuth": []}], summary="Get user profile", description="Retrieves the authenticated user's profile information")async def get_profile(request, response): # Access authenticated user info # request.user is available after authentication middleware return response.json({ "id": 123, "username": "johndoe", "email": "john@example.com" })
# Multiple protected endpoints@app.get("/settings", security=[{"bearerAuth": []}])async def get_settings(request, response): return response.json({"theme": "dark", "notifications": True})
@app.post("/posts", security=[{"bearerAuth": []}])async def create_post(request, response): return response.json({"id": 456, "title": "New Post"}, status=201)
@app.delete("/posts/{post_id}", security=[{"bearerAuth": []}])async def delete_post(request, response, post_id: int): return response.json({"deleted": True}, status=204)Custom Bearer Token Configuration
Section titled “Custom Bearer Token Configuration”Customize the bearer token scheme for specific requirements:
from sillo.openapi.models import HTTPBearer
# Add custom JWT authentication schemeapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "JWTAuth", HTTPBearer( type="http", scheme="bearer", bearerFormat="JWT", description="JWT token required in Authorization header. Format: 'Bearer <token>'" ))
@app.get( "/admin/users", security=[{"JWTAuth": []}], summary="List all users (Admin only)", description="Requires valid JWT token with admin privileges")async def admin_list_users(request, response): # Verify admin role in middleware return response.json({"users": []})🗝️ API Key Authentication
Section titled “🗝️ API Key Authentication”API keys provide simple authentication for programmatic access. They can be passed in headers, query parameters, or cookies:
Header-Based API Keys
Section titled “Header-Based API Keys”from sillo.openapi.models import APIKey
# Register API key schemeapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "ApiKeyAuth", APIKey( type="apiKey", name="X-API-Key", in_="header", description="API key for programmatic access. Contact support to obtain your key." ))
@app.get( "/api/data", security=[{"ApiKeyAuth": []}], summary="Get data via API key", description="Retrieve data using API key authentication")async def get_api_data(request, response): api_key = request.headers.get('X-API-Key') # Validate API key return response.json({"data": "sensitive information"})
# Multiple API key schemes for different purposesapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "AdminApiKey", APIKey( type="apiKey", name="X-Admin-Key", in_="header", description="Admin API key for elevated privileges" ))
@app.delete( "/admin/cleanup", security=[{"AdminApiKey": []}], summary="Admin cleanup operation")async def admin_cleanup(request, response): admin_key = request.headers.get('X-Admin-Key') # Validate admin key and perform cleanup return response.json({"cleaned": True})Query Parameter API Keys
Section titled “Query Parameter API Keys”# API key in query parameterapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "QueryApiKey", APIKey( type="apiKey", name="api_key", in_="query", description="API key passed as query parameter. Example: ?api_key=your_key_here" ))
@app.get( "/public-api/stats", security=[{"QueryApiKey": []}], summary="Get public statistics")async def get_public_stats(request, response): api_key = request.query_params.get('api_key') # Validate and return stats return response.json({"stats": {"users": 1000, "posts": 5000}})Cookie-Based API Keys
Section titled “Cookie-Based API Keys”# API key in cookieapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "SessionAuth", APIKey( type="apiKey", name="session_token", in_="cookie", description="Session token stored in HTTP cookie" ))
@app.get( "/dashboard", security=[{"SessionAuth": []}], summary="Get user dashboard")async def get_dashboard(request, response): session_token = request.cookies.get('session_token') # Validate session return response.json({"dashboard": "data"})OAuth2 Authentication
Section titled “OAuth2 Authentication”OAuth2 provides secure, delegated access and is ideal for third-party integrations. sillo supports all OAuth2 flows:
Authorization Code Flow
Section titled “Authorization Code Flow”from sillo.openapi.models import OAuth2
# Register OAuth2 authorization code flowapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "OAuth2AuthCode", OAuth2( type="oauth2", flows={ "authorizationCode": { "authorizationUrl": "https://auth.example.com/oauth/authorize", "tokenUrl": "https://auth.example.com/oauth/token", "refreshUrl": "https://auth.example.com/oauth/refresh", "scopes": { "read": "Read access to user data", "write": "Write access to user data", "admin": "Administrative access", "profile": "Access to user profile information" } } }, description="OAuth2 authorization code flow for secure third-party access" ))
@app.get( "/oauth/profile", security=[{"OAuth2AuthCode": ["read", "profile"]}], summary="Get user profile via OAuth2", description="Requires OAuth2 token with 'read' and 'profile' scopes")async def oauth_get_profile(request, response): # OAuth2 token validation handled by middleware return response.json({"profile": "data"})
@app.post( "/oauth/posts", security=[{"OAuth2AuthCode": ["write"]}], summary="Create post via OAuth2")async def oauth_create_post(request, response): return response.json({"created": True}, status=201)
@app.delete( "/oauth/admin/users/{user_id}", security=[{"OAuth2AuthCode": ["admin"]}], summary="Delete user (OAuth2 admin)")async def oauth_delete_user(request, response, user_id: int): return response.json({"deleted": True})Client Credentials Flow
Section titled “Client Credentials Flow”# OAuth2 client credentials for machine-to-machineapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "OAuth2ClientCreds", OAuth2( type="oauth2", flows={ "clientCredentials": { "tokenUrl": "https://auth.example.com/oauth/token", "scopes": { "api:read": "Read API access", "api:write": "Write API access", "api:admin": "Admin API access" } } }, description="OAuth2 client credentials flow for service-to-service authentication" ))
@app.get( "/api/v1/data", security=[{"OAuth2ClientCreds": ["api:read"]}], summary="Get data (service-to-service)")async def get_service_data(request, response): return response.json({"data": "service data"})Password Flow (Resource Owner)
Section titled “Password Flow (Resource Owner)”# OAuth2 password flow (use with caution)app.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "OAuth2Password", OAuth2( type="oauth2", flows={ "password": { "tokenUrl": "https://auth.example.com/oauth/token", "scopes": { "user": "User access", "admin": "Admin access" } } }, description="OAuth2 password flow (for trusted first-party applications only)" ))
@app.get( "/internal/data", security=[{"OAuth2Password": ["user"]}], summary="Get internal data")async def get_internal_data(request, response): return response.json({"internal": "data"})Multiple Authentication Methods
Section titled “Multiple Authentication Methods”Support multiple authentication methods to provide flexibility:
Alternative Authentication
Section titled “Alternative Authentication”# Either Bearer token OR API key@app.get( "/flexible-auth", security=[ {"BearerAuth": []}, {"ApiKeyAuth": []} ], summary="Endpoint supporting multiple auth methods", description="Accepts either Bearer token or API key authentication")async def flexible_auth_endpoint(request, response): # Check which auth method was used if request.headers.get('Authorization'): auth_type = "bearer" elif request.headers.get('X-API-Key'): auth_type = "api_key" else: return response.json({"error": "Authentication required"}, status=401)
return response.json({"auth_type": auth_type, "data": "protected data"})Combined Authentication Requirements
Section titled “Combined Authentication Requirements”# Require BOTH Bearer token AND API key@app.get( "/high-security", security=[ { "BearerAuth": [], "ApiKeyAuth": [] } ], summary="High security endpoint", description="Requires both Bearer token and API key for access")async def high_security_endpoint(request, response): # Both auth methods must be present return response.json({"data": "highly sensitive data"})Advanced Authentication Patterns
Section titled “Advanced Authentication Patterns”Role-Based Access Control
Section titled “Role-Based Access Control”# Custom security scheme with rolesapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "RoleBasedAuth", HTTPBearer( type="http", scheme="bearer", bearerFormat="JWT", description="JWT token with role-based access control" ))
@app.get( "/admin/reports", security=[{"RoleBasedAuth": []}], summary="Admin reports (requires admin role)", description="Requires JWT token with 'admin' role claim")async def admin_reports(request, response): # Role validation handled in middleware return response.json({"reports": []})
@app.get( "/moderator/content", security=[{"RoleBasedAuth": []}], summary="Moderator content (requires moderator role)")async def moderator_content(request, response): return response.json({"content": []})Conditional Authentication
Section titled “Conditional Authentication”@app.get( "/content/{content_id}", summary="Get content (auth optional)", description=""" Get content by ID. Authentication is optional but affects response: - Without auth: Returns public content only - With auth: Returns full content including private fields """)async def get_content(request, response, content_id: int): # Check if authenticated auth_header = request.headers.get('Authorization') is_authenticated = bool(auth_header and auth_header.startswith('Bearer '))
if is_authenticated: # Return full content return response.json({ "id": content_id, "title": "Content Title", "body": "Full content body", "private_notes": "Internal notes" }) else: # Return public content only return response.json({ "id": content_id, "title": "Content Title", "body": "Full content body" })Security Best Practices
Section titled “Security Best Practices”Comprehensive Error Responses
Section titled “Comprehensive Error Responses”from pydantic import BaseModel
class AuthErrorResponse(BaseModel): error: str code: int message: str details: dict = {}
@app.get( "/secure-data", security=[{"BearerAuth": []}], responses={ 200: {"description": "Success"}, 401: AuthErrorResponse, 403: AuthErrorResponse, 429: {"description": "Rate limit exceeded"} })async def get_secure_data(request, response): auth_header = request.headers.get('Authorization')
if not auth_header: error = AuthErrorResponse( error="MISSING_AUTH", code=401, message="Authorization header is required", details={"header": "Authorization", "format": "Bearer <token>"} ) return response.json(error.dict(), status=401)
if not auth_header.startswith('Bearer '): error = AuthErrorResponse( error="INVALID_AUTH_FORMAT", code=401, message="Invalid authorization format", details={"expected": "Bearer <token>", "received": auth_header[:20]} ) return response.json(error.dict(), status=401)
# Token validation logic here return response.json({"data": "secure information"})Authentication Middleware Integration
Section titled “Authentication Middleware Integration”# Example authentication middlewareasync def auth_middleware(request, response, next_call): """Authentication middleware for protected endpoints"""
# Skip auth for public endpoints if request.url.path in ['/health', '/docs', '/openapi.json']: return await next_call()
# Check for authentication auth_header = request.headers.get('Authorization') if not auth_header or not auth_header.startswith('Bearer '): return response.json({ "error": "Authentication required", "code": 401 }, status=401)
# Validate token (implement your logic) token = auth_header[7:] # Remove 'Bearer ' prefix user = await validate_jwt_token(token)
if not user: return response.json({ "error": "Invalid or expired token", "code": 401 }, status=401)
# Add user to request context request.user = user return await next_call()
# Apply middlewareapp.use(auth_middleware)Documentation Best Practices
Section titled “Documentation Best Practices”Clear Security Descriptions
Section titled “Clear Security Descriptions”@app.get( "/api/users", security=[{"BearerAuth": []}], summary="List users", description=""" Retrieve a list of users with pagination support.
**Authentication Required:** - Valid JWT token in Authorization header - Token must not be expired - User must have 'read:users' permission
**Rate Limits:** - 100 requests per minute per user - 1000 requests per hour per API key
**Example Request:** GET /api/users?limit=20 Authorization: Bearer <token> """,)async def list_users(request, response): ...GET /api/users?limit=20&offset=0Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...```""")
### Security Scheme Documentation
```python# Well-documented security schemesapp.openapi_config.add_security_scheme( "ComprehensiveAuth", HTTPBearer( type="http", scheme="bearer", bearerFormat="JWT", description=""" JWT Bearer token authentication.
**How to obtain a token:** 1. POST to /auth/login with credentials 2. Extract 'access_token' from response 3. Include in Authorization header: 'Bearer <token>'
**Token format:** - Standard JWT with HS256 signature - Expires after 1 hour - Contains user ID and permissions in claims
**Example:** Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9... """ ))Authentication documentation is crucial for API adoption and security. Clear, comprehensive documentation helps developers integrate quickly while maintaining security best practices.
What the schema can and cannot enforce
Section titled “What the schema can and cannot enforce”A security scheme in the OpenAPI document is a description, not a control.
Declaring bearerAuth on a route does not make sillo check for a token. That
is what dependencies and middleware are for. The schema tells clients what to
send; your code decides what to accept.
The gap matters in both directions. A route documented as requiring auth but not actually protected is a vulnerability that reads as secure. A route protected but not documented is an integration failure that reads as a bug in the client.
Keep them together structurally. If authentication is applied by a dependency, attach the security requirement in the same place the dependency is declared, so adding one without the other is visibly incomplete.
Documenting the token lifecycle
Section titled “Documenting the token lifecycle”The scheme declaration says “send a bearer token”. It does not say where one comes from, and that is the first thing an integrator needs.
Put the full lifecycle in the scheme description: which endpoint issues a token, what credentials it takes, how long the token lasts, how to refresh it, and what a client should do when it expires. A client that does not know a token expires in fifteen minutes will write code that breaks fifteen minutes into every session.
Document the failure responses too. A 401 with WWW-Authenticate means
“authenticate and retry”; a 403 means “you are authenticated and still
not allowed” and retrying is pointless. Clients that conflate them
produce infinite refresh loops against endpoints they will never be
permitted to call.
Scopes, and why they belong per endpoint
Section titled “Scopes, and why they belong per endpoint”If your tokens carry scopes, the schema is where a client learns which ones a given call needs. Declaring the scheme globally without per-route scopes tells integrators nothing, and the rational response is to request every scope available, which is precisely the outcome scopes exist to prevent.
Attach the minimum scope per route. It costs one line and it means a generated client, a security review, and an integrator all see the same answer to “what does this endpoint need”.
Security hygiene in the document itself
Section titled “Security hygiene in the document itself”Three things that leak through documentation rather than through code.
Do not put real credentials in examples. An example API key in a published schema is a published API key. Use obviously fake values with a recognisable prefix.
Do not document internal endpoints publicly. Admin routes, debug handlers, and internal health checks in a public schema are a map for someone enumerating your surface. Exclude them from the document.
Do not describe your rate limits so precisely that they become a targeting
guide, but do describe them well enough that a legitimate client can respect
them. The shape that works: state the limit and the window, document the 429
response and Retry-After, and leave the enforcement details out.
Testing that documented auth matches enforced auth
Section titled “Testing that documented auth matches enforced auth”The drift between “documented as protected” and “actually protected” is invisible until someone exploits it. One test closes the gap for the whole API:
def test_secured_routes_reject_anonymous(): schema = app.openapi() for path, methods in schema["paths"].items(): for method, operation in methods.items(): if not operation.get("security"): continue response = client.request(method.upper(), path.replace("{id}", "1")) assert response.status_code in (401, 403), f"{method} {path} is not protected"The inverse test is worth having too: routes that enforce authentication
but declare no security in the schema are undocumented, and integrators
will hit a 401 they had no way to anticipate.